
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Wine Forum ~ Wineweb.com</title>
		<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/index.cfm?forumid=1</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:08:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<webMaster>support@wineweb.com</webMaster>
		
		<item>
			<title>2004 Francois Cotat</title>
			<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=35&amp;amp;threadid=451</link>
			<description>Again, I would buy more of this higher priced wine because of its complexity, the flavors are blended well. </description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:16:45 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>2004 Francois Cotat</title>
			<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=35&amp;amp;threadid=451</link>
			<description>&quot;Wine value is a relative concept. If you pay $30 for a wine and when you tatste it you find that it is worth more than what you paid then it is considered a value.&quot;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This ties in more with what I said is the problem with my view of value and raises the question - why would someone find a bottle of wine to be worth more than the $30 paid? What do you expect in a $30 bottle of wine?  Don&apos;t you expect a $30 bottle of wine to be great, to be excellent?  I know I do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nopw this &quot;Even a $100 bottle of wine is a value if you enjoy the wine.&quot;  This of course is more in line with the non-problem idea of value - that anything, if it is serviceable is a value, no matter what the price.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The idea that an enjoyable $5 bottle of wine is a value just like an enjoyable $100 bottle of wine is a value seems to be a contradiction of values.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:41:30 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>2004 Francois Cotat</title>
			<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=35&amp;amp;threadid=451</link>
			<description>Wine value is a relative concept. If you pay $30 for a wine and when you tatste it you find that it is worth more than what you paid then it is considered a value. Again price and value are relative terms relating to what you are used to paying and drinking. Even a $100 bottle of wine is a value if you enjoy the wine.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 06:28:12 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>2004 Francois Cotat</title>
			<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=35&amp;amp;threadid=451</link>
			<description>&quot;I normally do not buy $30 bottles of wine&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is just my point - you spent more than you normally would and got more than you normally would.  Isn&apos;t that to be expected?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess my problem is that I tend to think of a &quot;value&quot; as something more akin to a &quot;deal&quot;, which it actually isn&apos;t.  If you get $30 worth of wine for $30, you have received fair value.   Again, I seem to think of &quot;value&quot; and &quot;fair&quot; as two different things.  I just can&apos;t get a good hold on the idea that half-bottles of Yquem at $120 represent what can be described as a value.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:46:43 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>2004 Francois Cotat</title>
			<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=35&amp;amp;threadid=451</link>
			<description>The value in this wine was the superb taste of the wine. The character of this wine had a good balance with a crisp finish. Now realize that I normally do not buy $30 bottles of wine but would most certainly buy this wine again. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 06:09:11 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>2004 Francois Cotat</title>
			<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=35&amp;amp;threadid=451</link>
			<description>You note the biggest problem with many French ros&#xe9; wines - the price.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What made this wine a &quot;value&quot; at $30?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:46:46 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>2004 Francois Cotat</title>
			<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=35&amp;amp;threadid=451</link>
			<description>Light orange hue, with a crisp, fresh taste. A truly fine Rose from France. $30 a bottle and a value at that. A must try for summer. </description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:14:09 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Tres Ojos</title>
			<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=35&amp;amp;threadid=439</link>
			<description>Indeed, it doesn&apos;t!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:42:51 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Tres Ojos</title>
			<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=35&amp;amp;threadid=439</link>
			<description>Julia thank you for the information. I tend to favor reds (merlot) in the winter and have not been a fan of whites, I think this Rose sounds like a wine for me. I&apos;m going to attempt to locate a bottle. Summer wine doesn&apos;t have to be white. </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:18:45 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Tres Ojos</title>
			<link>http://www.wineweb.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=35&amp;amp;threadid=439</link>
			<description>A wonderful, fresh and savory Rose from the Calatayud Region of Spain. The color is lovely to look at on a spring evening. Highly recommend it for around $8/bottle.  Picked up 2 bottles and am going back today fro more. Savor the flavor.&lt;img src=&quot;i/expressions/lips.gif&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:15:55 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
